MMCTS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH

MMCTS (October 9, 2006). doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000539
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joseph DeSimone
Paul Sergeant
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeSimone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sergeant, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeSimone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sergeant, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Revascularization of ischemic myocardium
 

Procedure


Off-pump myocardial revascularization

Joseph DeSimone and Paul Sergeant*

Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

* Corresponding author: * Cardiale Heelkunde, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium Tel.: +32-16-344260; fax +32-16-344616. E-mail: paul.sergeant{at}uzleuven.be


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
Since 1998, a large body of literature regarding off-pump coronary bypass surgery has been published, although varying techniques and outcomes likely have led to its inconsistent application. One approach has been developed and standardized at KU Leuven. This approach is straightforward and can be replicated without need for conversion toward cardiopulmonary bypass. The patient is ‘conditioned’ before and during the procedure. Both mammary arteries are harvested through a standard sternotomy. The anterior surface of the heart is exposed with a horizontal line of left-sided pericardial stitches, just above the level of the heart. The anterior coronary vessels are anastomosed after routine shunting. The lateral and inferior aspects of the heart are exposed without deforming the atrio-ventricular axis. This is performed in a stepwise manner. The first step is anchoring a sling into the posterior pericardium under the roof of the left atrium. Second, this sling is gradually pulled upwards, supporting the heart as a cradle. Once the heart is exposed toward the zenith, an apical suction device stabilizes, reformats and exposes the ventricle. The lateral and inferior walls are then revascularized. As a strict no-touch technique is used, free grafts are anastomosed to in-situ arterial grafts.

Key Words: OPCAB • Off-pump coronary artery bypass • Beating heart surgery


    History
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
In 1910, Carrel [1] first anastomosed a preserved carotid artery from the aorta to a coronary artery on the beating heart of a dog. The first description of a coronary bypass using the mammary artery to the left anterior descending (LAD) off-pump was by Kolesov in Leningrad, 1967 [2]. The widespread application of standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) followed, made possible by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This was used in a variety of approaches, with or without cardioplegic protection. The technique of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery did not become popular again until the late 1990s, when it attracted renewed interest. R.d.C. Lima's technique, using a series of pericardial retraction sutures, allowed access to the marginal arteries [3]. Improved exposure of the lateral wall, by placing a single stitch in the oblique sinus of the posterior pericardium, would later be described [4]. While these developments were occurring, Grundeman and Borst [5,6] advanced OPCAB surgery by applying suction technologies to expose and stabilize the coronary vessels. They studied spatial motion and the biological consequences of suction stabilization in the experimental laboratory and identified the superior stabilization of this technique. Since then conflicting and supporting evidence has been published, confused by the variability in technique, surgical discipline, and patient selection. Moreover, the literature is inconsistent with the use of statistical analysis. In 1999, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven formally adopted OPCAB for the coronary surgery service in a deliberate reengineering. Since that time, over 3000 consecutive off-pump cases have been performed, representing 99% of the coronary volume.


    Surgical procedure
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
The OR setup
The OR room should be kept warm until the patient is fully draped with the goal of keeping the patient's core temperature above 36 °C for the duration of the procedure. The most effective method for maintaining this ideal body temperature is to prevent cooling of the patient during the setup. A heated mattress is placed immediately beneath the patient; intravenous fluids and inhaled gases are also warmed.

The table should be capable of raising the patient's legs independent of the thorax. A magnetic mat stabilizes the most important instruments and is positioned on top of the legs, allowing unobstructed movement of the table (Photo 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 1 The table raises the legs without the need for Trendelenburg. This allows for increased ventricular filling without concomitant CVP increase, and the operative field remains undisturbed.

 
A suction tree is used, with separate controls for apical suction, stabilizer, and cell saver. The apical device is set no higher than 200 mmHg and the stabilizer is set no higher than 320 mmHg. The reason for such specific parameters is twofold. First, high rates of suction can cause hematomas and/or trauma to the myocardium. Second, the amount of force needed to expose the heart should be distributed between the suction device and the sling support to be described.

The patient's legs are secured with a padded block secured to the right side of the table to allow rotation of the table to the right, important for unloading the heart from the sling.

It is routine at KU Leuven to monitor the pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) via a Swan-Ganz catheter and have a transesophageal echo probe (TEE) in place. A less expensive alternative to the Swan-Ganz is direct measurement with a small catheter placed directly into the pulmonary artery.

Instruments

  • A reduced (50 items deleted) assortment of instruments and sutures, on the table.
  • An unopened set of instruments for conversion to CPB in the room.
  • A suction stabilization system.
  • An assortment of coronary shunts (from 1.0 to 3.0 mm in size) sorted and easily accessible to the team.
  • A number-1 Prolene that is 100 cm in length.
  • A stiff, thick silastic tube trimmed to 28 cm (Portex 800/012/200/800 3.0 mm x 5.0 mm).
  • An extra-long 30 cm tourniquet guide.
  • Arteriotomy scissors (0° straight blade, 45°, 90°, 125° angled blades Jacobson micro scissors, sharp fine tips, round handle, 7''/18 cm Scanlan and 170° Wexler).

Anesthesia
Mastery of the OPCAB technique requires an understanding of the vital interaction between surgery and anesthesia. The goal of every off-pump coronary bypass is to complete the case without electrical (not a single PVC) or hemodynamic instability. The patients are therefore ‘conditioned’ for this procedure from the moment of their arrival into the operating theatre to create a safety zone for the ‘anastomotic interval’.

The patient's temperature is maintained above 36 °C, most importantly by avoiding any heat loss during induction and draping. The thermostat in the room is set at 24 °C, and a heating mattress, warm fluids and gasses are used. The room temperature is normalized after draping if no temperature loss is observed.

Selective, long acting beta blockers are used to reduce heart rates above 80 bpm and atrial pacing to increase rates below 55 bpm. Atrial and ventricular wires are placed in case of any conduction disturbance. Ventricular wires are inserted in the presence of chronic atrial fibrillation to allow anesthesia to over-pace a blocked ventricular response. All pacing wires are placed and tested before the start of the ‘anastomotic interval’.

The patient's potassium is kept between 4 and 5 MeQ/dl and is checked every 15–20 min, to avoid any atrial ectopy.

The pulmonary artery diastolic pressure is used to monitor ventricular filling and as an early marker for ischemia. This is monitored using a Swan-Ganz or a catheter directly in the PA. The PAD is corrected and maintained between 10–15 mmHg. Raising and lowering the patient's legs is the first line of adjustment for this parameter, followed by fluid delivery and finally, if needed, selective alpha-1 agonists are used. When the core temperature exceeds 37 °C additional vasoconstriction is often required. Ionotropes are avoided by all means, since increased oxygen consumption may tip the patient into a zone of instability, leading to unnecessary and risky conversions. Long acting beta blockers and an increased depth of anesthesia are used to reduce high PA pressures.

General exposure
A standard median sternotomy is used for exposure. Once one or both mammary arteries have been harvested, the pericardium is opened along the midline. The T of the incision is carried out toward the apex, along the diaphragm, to allow unobstructed enucleation. The T is then extended to the right, without opening the right chest, to create sufficient workspace. The trough for one or both mammary arteries is cut prior to suspending the left side of the pericardium. The right side of the pericardium is suspended and the left side is released if the right-sided target is on the proximal right coronary artery (RCA).

Anterior wall revascularization
The exposure of the LAD is accomplished by placing a horizontal line of interrupted silk sutures along the left side of the pericardium, as low as possible without touching the heart. This maneuver alone should expose the LAD and diagonal vessels in virtually all cases. When visualization of the diagonals is insufficient, the enucleation is performed first (see below). Anastomoses to the diagonal are performed first only when sequenced to the LAD with the IMA. In all other circumstances, the LAD is grafted first (Video 1).


Figure 1
Click on image to view video
Video 1 The line of sutures extends the full length of the ventricle to avoid positional instability of the left ventricle. All of the sutures are clamped to the drapes or in the sternal retractor.
 
The suction stabilizer is then attached to the sternal retractor in the right lower position. With the stabilizer clamped in the right lower position its arms will be pointing in the opposite direction of flow in the LAD. This approach allows an unobstructed approach of the graft towards the anastomotic target.

The malleable arms of the device are shaped to allow optimal stabilization of the LAD while requiring less suction and placing less pressure on the cardiac surface. The stabilizer is transformed by enlarging the space between the arms, rotating or bending the arms. The holes can be occluded with bone wax to avoid suction on top of side branches. The coronary vessel is then dissected and explored. The use of everting traction sutures exposes and further stabilizes the target vessel (Video 2).


Figure 2
Click on image to view video
Video 2 Adjustment of the suction stabilizer.
 
The anastomotic region is surveyed in the usual fashion and an estimation of the internal diameter is made so that a proper size shunt is chosen. Strict attention is paid to proximal disease and side branches. This information will determine which direction the long end of the shunt will point, so as to avoid obstructing a side branch or creating selective perfusion. If necessary, the longest section is directed toward a tortuous vessel to straighten it and ensure flow.

A 4.0 prolene suture on a 180° needle with a soft tourniquet is placed around the coronary vessel proximal to the grafting site. If the coronary artery has an intramural or intraseptal pathway, the risk of injuring the vessel is increased and this suture is then omitted.

The vessel is incised normally using a full set of arteriotomy scissors covering all possible angulations. The tourniquet is then gently tightened to allow a clear field while placing the shunt. The longest section of the shunt is inserted first then the short end is inserted in a ‘goose-neck’ fashion. Once the proximal portion of the shunt is in place, the tourniquet is released and removed. The distal coronary perfusion area is then inspected for color and contractility (Video 3).


Figure 3
Click on image to view video
Video 3 Insertion of the shunt into the LAD.
 
A shunt is no guarantee of sufficient perfusion. As such, anesthesia will closely monitor the markers of ischemia and correct by increasing volume, administering selective vasoconstrictors or giving vasodilating agents. If ischemic changes occur, the surgeon is obligated to re-inspect the size and the pathway of the selected shunt.

The anastomosis is created by first placing a mattress stitch in the heel of the graft and then approximating it immediately to the vessel. The anastomosis is completed with the graft down on the target vessel. As a rule, the graft is not parachuted since it would later become difficult when grafting an obtuse marginal (OM) where there is little room to maneuver. For the sake of training, routine and speed, all anastomoses are created in an identical fashion (Video 4).


Figure 4
Click on image to view video
Video 4 LIMA to LAD.
 
Enucleation
Exposing the lateral and inferior walls of the heart, while maintaining stable hemodynamics, is the goal of every multi-vessel off-pump coronary. The preparation for enucleating the heart requires constant communication with anesthesia. This process is divided into three major steps: the deep stitch, the sling and the enucleation.

For the deep stitch: the surgeon needs three tools: a high-powered stiff suction, a folded dry gauze and a 100 cm #1 prolene, loaded and ready. The conditioning of the patient is reviewed by the surgeon and, if needed, optimized before continuing the procedure. Anesthesia is notified that the deep stitch is about to be placed and, when ready, gives permission to the surgeon to lift the heart (Video 5 and Schematic 1).


Figure 5
Click on image to view video
Video 5 The heart is lifted with the left hand from the apex cranially avoiding lateral displacement. The right hand places the gauze deep toward the transverse sinus, then the left hand is placed even deeper (beyond the AV groove) for maximal exposure of the posterior pericardium. The suction catheter clears the field of blood.
 

Figure 1
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Schematic 1 The stitch is placed in the posterior pericardium, as far cranially as possible and toward the right inferior pulmonary vein. The surgeon must be careful not to catch a pulmonary vein or the esophagus with the stitch.

 
For the sling: the surgeon needs three tools: a 28-cm thick silastic tube (see instruments), an extra-long 30 cm tourniquet guide and a moist 4x8 sponge. The conditioning of the patient is reviewed by the surgeon again and, if needed, optimized before continuation of the surgery. Anesthesia is notified that the sling is ready to be placed and, when ready, again gives permission to proceed (Video 6).


Figure 6
Click on image to view video
Video 6 While the surgeon lifts the heart with the left hand, the right hand, with a heavy forceps, guides the gauze down to the suture point avoiding injury to the myocardium. The assistant drives down the tourniquet with a heavy clamp so that it is secure and tight.
 
For enucleation: the surgeon gradually enucleates the heart by grasping both ends of the sling, rigorously avoiding any ectopic beat or cardiac dysfunction. The process is completed under strict anesthetic supervision. If this maneuver is performed correctly, the left atrium will mobilize in synchrony with the left ventricle without distortion of the mitral valve plateau (Video 7).


Figure 7
Click on image to view video
Video 7 The sling is pulled against the left side of the retractor, thereby avoiding any compression of the left ventricle. Gradual adjustments of the sling are required to keep the mass directly within the v-shape created by the gauze. Do not allow the heart to fall through the sling or to the side; this can be avoided by keeping the v-shape narrow and centered on the mass of the left ventricle.
 
Once the apex is pointing upwards, the leg block is checked to ensure that the patient's legs do not fall to the side. The table is rotated 30° to the right, further exposing the lateral wall of the heart and unloading it from the sling.

The apical suction device is clamped to the retractor in the upper right position. The optimal placement of the suction is on the antero-lateral side of the apex, avoiding the inferior wall and the LAD. Stay away the inferior surface so as to maintain suction despite the contour changes during reformatting. Once the apical suction device has been placed, the affect on the patient's hemodynamics must be checked.

NOTE: if the heart's only functioning area is the anterior/apical region, the apical suction likely will not be tolerated. A deterioration of heart function when the device is applied indicates that the surgeon should cease its use and proceed without the apical suction.

The use of the device accomplishes three tasks (Video 8), in order:


Figure 8
Click on image to view video
Video 8 The apical suction device in use.
 
  • Apical stabilization, accomplished once the arm of the suction device is in the surgeon's hand.
  • Reformatting of the ventricle. The sling has allowed exposure but causes the ventricle to become spherical. Gentle traction on the device will cause it to regain a conical shape. A convex inferior wall that becomes flat again is confirmation of a reformatted ventricle.
  • Exposure of the coronary vessels is attained by slowly retracting the apex toward the patient's right shoulder. Avoid retracting to the right lower portion of the wound as this can compress the inferior vena cava (IVC). The target vessels on the lateral wall can now be identified. Widening the v-shape of the sling may be necessary to maximize visualization.

Lateral wall revascularization
The suction stabilizer is most frequently clamped to the inferior right side of the retractor. Consequently, the arms of the stabilizer will point in the same direction as the lateral vessels. This reduces the amount of pressure applied by the device to the myocardium. The stability of the arm depends on the distance between the anastomotic region and the anchor point on the retractor; the shorter the distance, the stiffer the arm is. For more proximal branches of the circumflex, an anchor point on the left side of the retractor can be used.

The same principles of stabilization of the anterior vessels apply here. The target is exposed and the graft is prepared. Length is carefully measured from the planned proximal site on the mammary artery to the lateral wall. If a target is planned for the inferior wall, a similar measurement is taken distally. The opening in the graft is made and the anastomosis is completed, occluding both ends of the conduit before the completion (Videos 9 and 10).


Figure 9
Click on image to view video
Video 9 Lateral wall exposure shunting.
 

Figure 10
Click on image to view video
Video 10 Side to side free RIMA to OM anastomosis.
 
Ordinarily the next step is to complete revascularization of the inferior wall. However, in the event of ongoing ischemia or tight left main disease, the proximal anastomosis to the mammary artery should be completed first, to allow new blood flow to the suffering myocardium.

Inferior wall revascularization
Little adjustment of the sling or the apical suction device is needed for further exposure of the inferior wall. The stabilizer is fixed to the upper left side of the retractor. It is then applied in the same orientation as was used for the lateral wall. A shunt is placed, and the anastomosis is completed as described above (Videos 11 and 12).


Figure 11
Click on image to view video
Video 11 Inferior wall exposure and shunting.
 

Figure 12
Click on image to view video
Video 12 RIMA to PDA anastomosis.
 
Proximal anastomoses
In an effort to reduce the perioperative stroke rate, this technique eliminates the use of proximal anastomoses to the aorta. The free right internal mammary (RIMA), or, alternatively, the saphenous vein graft (SVG), is connected to the proximal LIMA. This anastomosis may be shunted if there is ongoing ischemia or tight left main disease. The proximal and distal LIMA are occluded temporarily to facilitate the anastomosis. Air is removed from the vessels by retrograde filling.


    Application
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
The application of OBCAB should be broad if results are to influence mortality, morbidity and resource consumption in the CABG cohort. The distribution of vessel disease should not preclude the number and location of bypasses performed, since technology now allows for proper exposure [7,8]. Furthermore, with increased experience, performing cases on recent infarcts, re-operations and intra-myocardial vessels becomes a reality. At KU Leuven, virtually all (99%) of CABGs are performed using the OPCAB approach. Only those patients undergoing CPR, those who are electrically unstable (VT/VF), those who are in pulmonary edema (saturation below 90%) or those who are in severe cardiogenic shock (CI below 1L/M2) are excluded.


    Conversion
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
The term conversion is used liberally in the literature and in day to day practice. Some have reported that conversion carries a higher risk than performing the procedure on pump initially [9]. However, the term must be qualified for its meaning; a crash conversion and a confidence conversion are different. The surgeon must also consider whether it was conversion or the initial pathology that led to the increased mortality. The commitment of the entire coronary team is necessary if the intention is to master OPCAB and treat the full spectrum of coronary disease. Having strict standard operating procedures (SOP) in place prior to undertaking an OPCAB procedure will reduce the tendency to convert unnecessarily. ‘Conversion’ is defined at our unit as a switch towards CPB after the start of the first anastomosis and for whatever reason. Outcomes at KU Leuven after more than 3000 cases reveal a <0.4% conversion rate and not a single conversion in the last 1000 cases. Only one patient died of the 11 converted cases.


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
Critical analysis of the literature

  • Published OPCAB studies propose a wide spectrum of concepts. This variability includes the use of shunts, suction versus pushing stabilizers, anchor stitch placement, sling versus suture retraction, apical suction devices, inotropic support, aortic clamping, and hemodynamic instability while in the operating room. These variables may produce inconsistent data and call into question the relative safety of OPCAB when compared with standard CAB with cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Because of the low rate of postoperative events in CABG literature, OPCAB studies will demand very large cohorts to demonstrate sufficient power to show reliable statistical significance. Most randomized studies failed on the power issue. Each group would require 73,000 patients or 2319 patients, respectively, to guarantee correct power to identify a 10% or 50% reduction of events. This is in the presence of an event rate of 2% with an alpha of 0.05 and a power goal of 0.80.

Mortality

  • A well-known, large OPCAB series shows a reduction in early mortality measuring thirty days postoperatively [10]. The thirty-day mark has been the convention; however, 3 months is a more accurate time frame to detect early risk after CABG [11]. An in-depth KU Leuven analysis, correcting for variability with saturated propensity scoring and multivariate analysis but including only 1740 unselected consecutive OPCAB cases, revealed a 20% reduction in 3-month mortality but did not reach statistical significance for obvious power reasons [12]. This reduction remains stable and is approaching statistical significance in our continuous follow up including 3000 unpublished patients.

Morbidity

  • Stroke and cognitive function: the current OPCAB literature includes small data samples and unclear implementation of the no-touch technique, reports varying stroke rates and inadequately conveys the true advantage of OPCAB in lowering stroke rates. Strong evidence at KU Leuven, where the no-touch aortic technique is strictly in force, demonstrates that patients suffer fewer strokes off-pump than on-pump, particularly when they have significant carotid stenosis [12]. There is also evidence that off-pump surgery can result in better neurocognitive functioning in the early postoperative period [13].
  • Renal failure: some of the largest and best controlled studies show a higher need for dialysis following on-pump versus OPCAB surgery [14]. The evidence at this institution supports this finding in patients with a preoperative creatinine value of 2.5 or higher (Graph 1).
  • Hospital stay: the issue of hospital stay remains unanswered. Socio-economic differences, professional prerogative and rehabilitation practices vary so greatly between hospitals and countries that it is difficult to compare hospital stays.
  • Long-term follow up: all patients are followed for their complete life spans, according to the 35-year tradition at KU Leuven. All angiographic evaluations, early or late in follow up, are registered in the database when they are performed. In previous KU Leuven publications on long-term survival and freedom from angina, more than 10,000 patients were studied. However, very large cohorts will be needed to allow correction for all of the residual variability in the currently treated population before evidence regarding long term performance will be available.
  • Economic aspects: the OPCAB literature is mixed regarding the procedure's financial burden [15,16]. Most of the increase in cost is allocated to the operating room in the form of new materials and increased operative time. The implementation of OPCAB can, in fact, be a cost effective strategy, as the initial costs are offset by streamlining the human and material resources previously required for conventional coronary surgery. Perfusionists have reengineered their profession into cardiac technologists at KU Leuven and have not been in the operating theatres during OPCAB surgery for years. We and other institutions have realized cost savings by adopting this and other strategies.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Graph 1 2413 OPCAB patients at KU Leuven demonstrated a decreased need for dialysis or hemofiltration post-operatively. This group excludes acute myocardial infarction and dialysis dependant patients.
 


    References
 Top
 Summary
 History
 Surgical procedure
 Application
 Conversion
 Results
 References
 
  1. Carrel A. On the experimental surgery of the thoracic aorta and the heart. Ann Surg 1910;52:83–95.[Medline]
  2. Kolessov VI. Mammary artery–coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967;54:535–544.[Medline]
  3. Lima RC, Escobar M, Wanderley Neto J, et al. Revascularização do miocárdio sem circulação extracorpórea: resultados imediatos. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1993;8:171–176.
  4. Bergsland J, Karamanoukian HL, Soltoski PR, Salerno TA. "Single suture" for circumflex exposure in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1428–1430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Grundeman PF, Borst C, van Herwaarden JA, Verlaan CWJ, Jansen EWL. Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the octopus tissue stabilizer: influence on coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1348–1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Grunenfelder J, Comber M, Lachat M, Leskosek B, Turina M, Zund G. Validation of intracoronary shunt flow measurements for off-pump coronary artery bypass operations. Heart Surg Forum 2004;7:26–30.[Medline]
  7. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, Marshall JJ, Leimbach M, Huber P, Garas S, Sammons BH, McCall SA, Petersen RJ, Bailey DE, Chu H, Mahoney EM, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:797–808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Singh SK, Mishra SK, Kumar D, Yadave RD, Agarwal R, Sinha SK. Total arterial revascularization on beating heart: experience in 803 cases. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2003;11:107–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Edgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Jones KK, Mack MJ. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1138–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cleveland JC Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1282–1289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Osswald BR, Blackstone EH, Tochtermann U, Thomas G, Vahl CF, Hagl S. The meaning of early mortality after CABG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:401–1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, Bert C, Van Hemelrijck J, Bogaerts C, Sergeant G. OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:779–785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, Yamauchi H, Lau WT, Popper J, Stein A, Johnson D, Lee D, Petrovitch H, Dang CR. Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:18–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:493–498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. Does Off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;102:188–203.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Marshall JJ. Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1477–1484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joseph DeSimone
Paul Sergeant
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeSimone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sergeant, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeSimone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sergeant, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Revascularization of ischemic myocardium


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH