MMCTS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH

MMCTS (December 17, 2007). doi:10.1510/mmcts.2007.002824
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fattori, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russo, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fattori, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russo, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Descending and thoraco-abdominal aorta
 

Procedure


Degenerative aneurysm of the descending aorta. Endovascular treatment

Rossella Fattori* and Vincenzo Russo

Cardiothoracovascular Department, Cardiovascular Radiology Unit, University Hospital S. Orsola, Padiglione 21-Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy

* Corresponding author: * Tel.: +39-051-6364747; fax: +39-051-6364747 rossella.fattori{at}unibo.it


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms has a rate of occurrence of 10.9 cases per 100,000 person/year, with an estimated 5-year risk of rupture ranging from 16% (diameter between 4 and 5.9 cm) to 31% (6 cm or more). Despite increasing awareness of the important role of early diagnosis in treatment options, guidelines about therapeutic strategies are actually lacking, as well as definite evidence of pharmacological treatment able to resolve or delay the disease progression. Endovascular treatment proposed as alternative to surgery has been considered a therapeutic innovation, especially because of low invasiveness, which allows to treat even high surgical risk patients. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia, mechanical ventilation and blood pressure invasive monitoring (right radial artery cannulation). The common femoral artery or external iliac artery are used for access after surgical exposure. After exposition of the artery, a 6F sheath is inserted and 5000 UI of heparin administered. Angiography is then performed to identify the lesion, landing zones and its relation to side branches. Endovascular stent-graft is thus loaded on an extra-stiff guidewire and delivered, with induced hypotension, under fluoroscopic and transesophageal echo control. Post procedural angiography and echocardiography control are performed to reveal the final result.

Key Words: Endovascular treatment • Thoracic aortic aneurysm


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In the past decades the incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) was estimated to be 3.5 cases per 100,000 person/year. Recently, a population-based study of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm reported an incidence of 10.9 cases per 100,000 person/year, revealing an increased rate of occurrence of the disease [1]. Although many studies have identified risk factors related to the formation and progression of aortic aneurysms, none has fully explained the etiology of the disorder. Atherosclerosis could be considered a concomitant process and not a direct cause of aneurysm formation and growth. Recently, the role of inflammation has also been investigated in promoting aneurysm growth and rupture. Aortic medial degeneration has been demonstrated in most aneurysms, regardless of their cause and location.

The overall survival of patients with TAAs has improved significantly in the past few years. The estimated 5-year risk of rupture of a TAA with a diameter between 4 and 5.9 cm is 16%, but it rises to 31% for aneurysms of 6 cm or more.

Thoracic aortic diseases historically represent a challenge for surgeons, due to procedural complexity and clinical problems related to surgical access and anesthetic techniques. Atherosclerosis being the major leading cause, affected people are mostly aged, often with co-morbidities such as ischemic heart disease, hypertension, COPD or diabetes, which negatively influence surgical risk and patient outcome. The surgical access, consisting in thoracotomy with often associated phreno-laparotomy, is particularly invasive and carries substantial risks of serious cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunctions. Hemorrhage, coagulative disorders, medullar ischemia, cerebrovascular accident and renal failure could complicate surgery and postoperative outcome and, therefore, patient prognosis. Mortality and morbidity range from 5 to 15% in elective cases and up to 50% in emergency situations [2, 3].

Endovascular treatment (EVT), proposed as alternative to surgery, has been considered a therapeutic innovation, especially because of low invasiveness, which allows to treat even at-risk patients.


    Endovascular procedure
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The technique is described in the following text and highlighted by schematics and intraoperative angiographic photos and videos. Preoperative and postprocedural multidetector CT scans of the entire aorta are also shown. Images and videos belong to a 55-year-old man with a large (55 mm) degenerative aneurysm of the middle portion of the thoracic descending aorta (Photo 1 and Video 1), undergoing endovascular treatment.


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 1 Multidetector CT volume rendering (A, B) and MIP (C, D) reconstructions showing thoracic aortic aneurysm (arrow in A, C) and vascular access (B, D).

 

Figure 1
Click on image to view video
Video 1 CT scan performed before endovascular procedure. The aorta is visualized from supra-aortic vessels to femoral arteries. An atherosclerotic aneurysm is visible in the mid portion of the thoracic descending aorta.
 
Endovascular stent-graft placement procedure is performed through femoral or external iliac approach, usually under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation, and must be done in a standard operating room equipped with an angiographic set and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Blood pressure is monitored by right radial artery cannulation. When femoral arteries are too small, vascular access may be achieved through the common iliac artery or the abdominal aorta using a temporary conduit to provide vascular access. All the procedures should be performed under fluoroscopy and, if available, TEE which can provide additional information, such as the optimal landing zone or, after stent-graft delivery, the presence of perigraft leakage or kinking.

After the percutaneous (Seldinger technique) insertion of a 5F introducer, a 5F sheath with distal radio opaque markers (e.g. Cordis/Johnson & Johnson – MMCTSLink 157) is placed via the left brachial artery to identify the left subclavian artery ostium and allow angiography during the procedure. This marker is crucial for optimal stent placement in aneurysms with a short proximal neck. In more distal lesions, a catheter may be placed inside the celiac trunk through contralateral femoral artery approach to mark its origin.

After exposition of the femoral artery (a schematic is available at http://www.medscape.com/content/2004/00/46/66/466607/art-466607.fig1.jpg) a 6F introducer (Photo 2A) and a 6F sheath (Photo 2B) are inserted, a guidewire is positioned in the ascending aorta and 5000 UI bolus of heparin administered.


Figure 2
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 2 A sample of some tools necessary to perform an endovascular procedure. A=Introducer; B=Sheath and pigtail catheter; C=Extra stiff guidewire; D=Stent-graft remodeling balloon.

 
Thus, angiography is performed to identify the lesion, its relation to side branches and optimal landing zone (Photo 3 and Video 2).


Figure 3
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 3 Angiographic run performed to identify the aneurysm (asterisk) and its relation to side branches (supra-aortic vessels and celiac trunk). Optimal proximal and distal landing zones are also shown (arrows).

 

Figure 2
Click on image to view video
Video 2 Angiography performed to identify the aneurysm and its relation to side branches (supra-aortic vessels and celiac trunk).
 
The stent-graft delivery system is then loaded over a 260–300-cm long extra-stiff guidewire (e.g. Back-Up Meier/Boston Scientific or Lunderquist/Cook – MMCTSLink 158) through the transverse arteriotomy of the common femoral artery and advanced under fluoroscopy (Photos 2C and 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 4 Fluoroscopy of stent-graft delivery system just before the release. Proximal and distal graft closure markers are showed (arrows).

 
When the optimal landing zone is reached, the endoprosthesis is delivered under fluoroscopic control (Photo 5, Schematic 1 and Video 3), with induced hypotension (systolic pressure <70 mmHg) to prevent inadvertent downstream displacement of the stent-graft during delivery.


Figure 5
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 5 Fluoroscopy of thoracic stent-graft immediately after release.

 

Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Schematic 1 Thoracic stent-graft delivery and aneurysm exclusion. (Reproduced from http://www.slrctsurgery.com/Thoracic%20aortic%20aneurysms.htm with permission from St. Luke's- Roosevelt Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery.)

 

Figure 3
Click on image to view video
Video 3 Fluoroscopy of stent-graft delivery. (Playing in loop 4 times.)
 
After deployment, TEE control (Photo 6) and angiography (Video 4) are performed to reveal the final result and in case of perigraft leakage (Photo 7) or graft kinking, a latex balloon is then introduced and inflated to mould the stent-graft and obtain its complete expansion (Photos 2D and 8). After TEE control, a final aortogram is then performed to verify proper stent-graft positioning and complete aneurysm exclusion (Photo 9 and Video 5).


Figure 6
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 6 Fluoroscopy of TEE (arrows) control of proximal (A) and distal (B) stent-graft extremities. TEE is able to identify even very small perigraft leakage.

 

Figure 4
Click on image to view video
Video 4 Angiography performed after stent-graft release. A minimal late perigraft leakage is visible at the distal portion of the stent.
 

Figure 7
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 7 Angiography performed at the end of the procedure. The aneurysm sac is not completely excluded by the stent-graft, because of a small and late perigraft leakage at the distal portion of the stent.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 8 Fluoroscopy of balloon stent-graft remodeling. The balloon (black arrow) is inflated along the distal neck of a stent-graft under TEE control (white arrow).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 9 Angiography performed at the end of the procedure, after TEE control. The aneurysm sac is now completely excluded by the stent-graft, and perigraft leakage is absent.

 

Figure 5
Click on image to view video
Video 5 Angiography performed after balloon inflation at the distal neck site. The aneurysm is now completely excluded from the blood flow.
 
Finally, the delivery sheath is removed and the arteriotomy is sutured.

TEE is fundamental during endovascular procedure [4, 5, 6, 7]. With this technique it is possible to visualize the correct position of guide, catheters and stent-graft system. Furthermore, TEE provides a real-time evaluation of aortic wall condition at the neck sites, constituting a simple fluoroscopic marker of proximal or distal landing zone. After stent-graft delivery, TEE with color-Doppler is able to identify blood flow inside the aneurysm sac (endoleak) or initial thrombosis (echo-contrast effect) as an indicator of the efficacy of the procedure [7]. When balloon inflation for stent remodeling is necessary, TEE could establish the correct grade of balloon distension and the contact with aortic wall, avoiding the risk of overinflation and aortic wall damage. TEE, therefore, is useful in all phases of endovascular procedure allowing to reduce the use of angiography and, thus, radiations and contrast media, reducing potential risk of complications.


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Results of literature international registries and a single-center series are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Procedural success, complications and survival rates of endovascular treatment of TAAs. Authors personal experience and most important registries.

 
The Stanford Clinical Trial, the first performed with thoracic stent-graft [8, 9, 10], with a large population (103 patients) and 10 years of follow-up, showed a perioperative mortality rate of 9%, and a survival rate of 82%, 49% and 27%, respectively, after 1, 5 and 8 years. However, most of the deaths (57/65, 87.7%) arose from nonaortic causes such as cancer, cerebrovascular accident, acute myocardial infarction or heart failure and many others. Freedom from aortic rupture was, indeed, 99%, 94% and 91% at 1, 5 and 8 years.

Results about endovascular treatment of TAAs with ‘second generation’ stent-grafts, arise from multicenter international registries such as EUROSTAR, GORE-TAG and TTR [11, 12, 13].

In the EUROSTAR (European collaborators on stent/graft techniques for thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection repair) [11] registry, 249 of 443 patients had a degenerative thoracic aneurysm. Primary technical success was obtained in 87%; device-related complications occurred intraoperatively in 16% of patients, and arterial injuries in 2.4% of patients. Neurologic events consisted of paraplegia/paraparesis (4.0%) or stroke (2.8%). Perioperative mortality rates ranged from 5.3% in elective procedures and 28% in emergency repair. Late survival after one-year follow-up was 80% with 2.1% of aneurysm-related deaths.

In the GORE-TAG registry [12], 139 of 142 patients (98%) had a successful implantation of endovascular device with a perioperative mortality rate of 1.5%. Major complications included stroke (4%), paraplegia-paraparesis (3%) and vascular trauma (14%). Device-related complication such as migration, components disconnection or wire fractures has been reported in 10–14% of cases during the 2 years of follow-up period. Overall, 2-year survival rate was 75% with an aneurysm-related mortality of 2%.

The TTR (Talent Thoracic Retrospective) [13] registry collected data from 457 patients (344 elective and 113 emergency): 137 of them had a degenerative aortic aneurysm. Perioperative overall mortality rate was 5% with in-hospital complication rate of 3.7% for stroke, 1.7% for paraplegia-paraparesis and 3.3% for vascular injuries. Device-related complication has been reported in 2.4% of cases. Survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 91%, 85% and 77.5%, respectively, with an aneurysm-related mortality of 2.6%.

The most frequently reported complications in EVT were stroke and paraplegia, ranging respectively from 2.8 to 3.7% and from 1.7 to 14% [11, 12, 13].

Our personal experience is based on 224 patients treated with stent-graft for different thoracic aortic diseases (aortic dissection, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, intramural hematoma and aneurysm): 45 of them were affected by TAA. Forty-two procedures have been elective while three patients underwent stent-graft repair under emergency conditions. Technical success rate was 97%, with no in-hospital mortality. Major complications consisted of paraparesis in two patients and paraplegia in one patient. Stent related mortality (aortic rupture and aorto-esophageal fistula) occurred in two patients during follow-up. Aorto-esophageal fistula has been frequently reported after TAA endovascular treatment, representing one of the most dreadful complications of EVT of large atherosclerotic aneurysms. The close contact of a large aneurysm sac with the esophagus, along with inflammatory response of the aneurysm wall to a foreign body may ultimately lead to adventitial erosion and fistulization.


    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Even if innovative and less invasive, EVT is not feasible in all of TAAs, due to anatomic features: vascular imaging is crucial for patient selection, endoprosthesis choice and planning of the treatment.

Anatomic conditions
To assess EVT feasibility, a complete visualization of the entire aorta with a CT scan from supra-aortic vessel to femoral arteries is mandatory, in order to evaluate lesion morphology, state of the aortic wall, and anatomy of the vascular access site (Photo 1 and Video 1).

Efficacy of EVT is based on radial forces of endoprosthesis due to nitinol core, a bind of nickel and titanium characterized by elastic proprieties together with thermic memory and strength. An oversizing of the prosthesis caliber ranging from 10 to 20% if compared to aortic neck diameter, is generally able to ensure a good attachment and, therefore, an exclusion of the aneurysm sac from blood flow. An accurate measurement of aortic diameters is thus mandatory in EVT planning (Photo 10).


Figure 10
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 10 Multidetector CT axial (A, D), oblique sagittal (B, E) and coronal (C, F) reconstructions showing proximal (A–C) and distal (D–F) neck measurements, mandatory for procedure success.

 
The diameter of stent-graft releasing systems ranges from 22 to 27 French (7 to 9 mm) and the femoro-iliac access must be dimensionally adequate, especially in the presence of atherosclerosis, calcifications and tortuosity (Photo 11).


Figure 11
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 11 Multidetector CT reconstructions showing iliac (B, C) and femoral (D, E) arteries measurements. The femoro-iliac caliber is big enough to consent the passage of the stent-graft delivery system. Furthermore, no tortuosity and no calcifications are present.

 
Aortic wall assessment at the level of landing zone is a crucial step in the feasibility assessment. An atheromasic, thrombotic or heavy calcified wall could cause failure of aneurysm sealing. It is generally accepted that the length of neck (a portion of normal aortic wall between the origin of left subclavian artery/celiac trunk and proximal/distal extremities of the aneurysm) should be at least 1–1.5 cm. If the aortic neck is shorter than 1 cm it could be unable to exclude aneurysm from blood flow, with a high risk of device migration in the long-term.

Extension of the anatomic coverage of the proximal neck is possible by intentional occlusion of the left subclavian artery with or without previous left subclavian artery revascularization by extra anatomic bypass of supra-aortic vessels. Controversy exists regarding the need of left subclavian artery revascularization before stent-graft occlusion. Steinberg et al. [14] reported an incidence of 5.4% of ischemic complications in intentional occlusion of the vertebral artery. A recent meta-analysis on endovascular repair of proximal descending aorta [15] reports 28% of complications in patients in which occlusion of the left subclavian artery is not protected by previous revascularization, with respect to 3% of complications in patients previously submitted to preventive revascularization. Left subclavian artery bypass or transposition could be performed with a supra-clavear surgical approach: this technique is minimally invasive and could preserve from potential complications like cerebellar infarction (vertebral artery occlusion) and subclavian-vertebral steal syndrome [15]. Furthermore, reperfusion of the aneurismatic sac from subclavian artery (type II endoleak) could be avoided.

Postoperative follow-up
CT is the modality of choice also in the post-procedural follow-up.

A close imaging follow-up is recommended during the first year (1, 3, 6 and 12 months) after the procedure [16, 17] (Photo 12 and Video 6).


Figure 12
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Photo 12 MDCT scan performed after endovascular procedure. Volume rendering (A, B) and MIP (C, D) reconstructions showing the complete exclusion of aneurysm sac (arrows).

 

Figure 6
Click on image to view video
Video 6 CT scan performed after endovascular procedure. The aneurysm sac is completely thrombosed (complete aneurysm seal).
 
The most important morphologic parameters that should be evaluated are the presence/absence of blood flow inside the aneurysm sac (endoleak), aortic dimension, morphology of prosthesis (position and structural integrity), diameter and morphology of proximal and distal neck and aortic wall abnormalities. The presence of blood flow inside the aneurysm sac (endoleak) is an indicator of procedural failure and has an important clinical impact in thoracic aortic disease, with a potential risk of aortic rupture.

According to current nomenclature, five types of endoleak have been identified [18, 19, 20] (Schematic 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Schematic 2 Most common types of endoleak: type I (A) from proximal or distal neck; type II (B) from a tributary artery; type III (C) due to stent rupture or malposition; and type IV (D) by graft macroporosity. (Reproduced from Rousseau H, Bolduc JP, Dambrin C, Marcheix B, Canevet G, Lannareix V, Cron C, Mugniot A, Otal P, Joffre F. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. In: Cowling MG, Editor. Vascular Interventional Radiology – Current evidence in endovascular surgery. Springer Verlag Inc, 2006:108 with permission from Springer Verlag and the authors.)

 
Endoleak is defined type I when blood flow originates from proximal or distal extremities of the graft, with reperfusion of aneurysm sac; type II endoleak is caused by a retrograde blood flow arising from a tributary artery of excluded portion (left subclavian artery, intercostal arteries). Type III endoleak originates from a prosthetic material defect (holes, laceration) or from segment disconnection; type IV endoleak is caused by stent macroporosity and generally resolves spontaneously, while type V (endotension) derives from a pressure rise inside excluded sac without evidence of blood flow. Endoleaks may occur early or late during follow-up: the former appear often at the end of EV procedure, the latter during follow-up examinations.

Type I and type III endoleaks need immediate surgical (conversion to open surgery) or endovascular procedure (proximal or distal graft extension) because they usually lead to aneurysm sac expansion and rupture. Treatment of type II endoleaks is dependent by aneurysm expansion during follow-up; however, most of type II endoleaks evolve to spontaneous sealing [13].

Migration of the stent-graft is rarely reported in thoracic series. Migration of a thoracic stent-graft may cause aortic branches occlusion such as celiac trunk and other splanchnic vessels with severe ischemic consequences.

Early and mid-term results of thoracic atherosclerotic aneurysm EVT are encouraging. However, long-term outcome data results are necessary to definitively assess reliability of stent-graft materials and improvement in patient survival.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In conclusion, in the choice between surgical or endovascular repair of TAAs, many factors must be considered, including clinical conditions, co-morbidities, anatomic situation, materials' efficacy and last, but not less important, experience of the center.



    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors acknowledge the department of Radiology and the SCOM, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France for Schematic 2.


    References
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Endovascular procedure
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Clouse WD, Hallett JW Jr, Schaff HV, Gayari MM, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ 3rd. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysm: a population-based study. J Am Med Assoc 1998;280:1926–1929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mastroroberto P, Chello M. Emergency thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: clinical outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:477–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kouchoukos NT, Dougenis D. Surgery of the thoracic aorta. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1876–1889.[Free Full Text]
  4. Fattori R, Caldarera I, Rapezzi C, Rocchi G, Napoli G, Parlapiano M, Favali M, Pierangeli A, Gavelli G. Primary endoleakage in endovascular treatment of the thoracic aorta: importance of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:490–495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Moskowitz DM, Kahn RA, Konstadt SN, Mitty H, Hollier LH, Marin ML. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography as an adjuvant to fluoroscopy during endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;17:22–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. SchÜtz W, Gauss A, Meierhenrich R, Pamler R, GÖrich J. Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of thoracic aortic stent-graft implantation. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:II14–II19.[Medline]
  7. Rocchi G, Lofiego C, Biagini E, Piva T, Bracchetti G, Lovato L, Parlapiano M, Ferlito M, Rapezzi C, Branzi A, Fattori R. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided algorithm for stent-graft implantation in aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:880–885.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Dake MD, Miller DC, Semba CP, Mitchell RS, Walker PJ, Liddell RP. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1729–1734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mitchell RS, Miller DC, Dake MD, Semba CP, Moore KA, Sakai T. Thoracic aortic aneurysm repair with an endovascular stent graft: the "first generation". Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1971–1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Demers P, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Kee ST, Sze D, Razavi MK, Dake MD. Midterm results of endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with first-generation stent grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:664–673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Leurs LJ, Bell R, Degrieck Y, Thomas S, Hobo R, Lundbom J. EUROSTAR, UK Thoracic Endograft Registry collaborators. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:670–679.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Kee ST, Sicard G, Chaikof E, Bavaria J, Williams D, Cambria RP, Mitchell RS. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Fattori R, Nienaber CA, Rousseau H, Beregi JP, Heijmen R, GrabenwÖger M, Piquet P, Lovato L, Dabbech C, Kische S, Gaxotte V, Schepens M, Ehrlich M, Bartoli JM. Results of endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta with the Talent Thoracic stent graft: The Talent Thoracic Retrospective Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:332–339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Steinberg GK, Drake CG, Peerless SJ. Deliberate basilar or vertebral artery occlusion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Immediate results and long-term outcome in 201 patients. J Neurosurg 1993;79:161–173.[Medline]
  15. Peterson BG, Eskandari MK, Gleason TG, Morasch MD. Utility of left subclavian artery revascularization in association with endoluminal repair of acute and chronic thoracic aortic pathology. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:433–439.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Fattori R, Napoli G, Lovato L, Grazia C, Piva T, Rocchi G, Angeli E, Di Bartolomeo R, Gavelli G. Descending thoracic aortic diseases: stent-graft repair. Radiology 2003;229:176–183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fattori R, Napoli G, Lovato L, Russo V, Pacini D, Pierangeli A, Gavelli G. Indications for, timing of, and results of catheter-based treatment of traumatic injury to the aorta. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:603–609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. White GH, Yu W, May J. Endoleak: a proposed new terminology to describe incomplete aneurysm exclusion by an endoluminal graft. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:124–125.[Medline]
  19. Wain RA, Marin ML, Ohki T, Sanchez LA, Lyon RT, Rozenblit A, Suggs WD, Yuan JG, Veith FJ. Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:69–78; discussion 78–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T, Amor M, Adiseshiah M, Blankensteijn JD, Buth J, Chuter TA, Fairman RM, Gilling-Smith G, Harris PL, Hodgson KJ, Hopkinson BR, Ivancev K, Katzen BT, Lawrence-Brown M, Meier GH, Malina M, Makaroun MS, Parodi JC, Richter GM, Rubin GD, Stelter WJ, White GH, White RA, Wisselink W, Zarins CK. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1029–1035.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fattori, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russo, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fattori, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russo, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Descending and thoraco-abdominal aorta


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH