MMCTS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH

MMCTS (May 8, 2009). doi:10.1510/mmcts.2009.003921
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jamshid H. Karimov
Mattia Glauber
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karimov, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karimov, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Aortic valve replacement
Right arrowLatest literature
Right arrowRelated content
 

Comment


Commentary on aortic valve replacement through a right-sided anterior minithoracotomy access

Jamshid H. Karimova,b and Mattia Glaubera,*

a CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, ‘G. Pasquinucci’ Heart Hospital, Via Aurelia Sud, 54100 Massa, Italy
b Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy

* Corresponding author: Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-0585-493604; fax: +39-0585-493614. glauber{at}ifc.cnr.it

Key Words: Aortic valve replacement • Minithoracotomy • Minimally invasive


    Comment
 Top
 Comment
 References
 
In November 2008 MMCTS published an article describing our approach for an aortic valve surgery in the 2nd intercostal space (Schematic 1) with an emphasis on patient preparation and operative technique [1]. From January 2005 to December 2008, more than 150 consecutive patients with a severe aortic valve disease underwent an aortic valve replacement in our institution.


Figure 1
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Schematic 1 Schematic illustration of minithoracotomy access through the 2nd intercostal space.

 
The preparation technique remains the same. However, we do not place an additional working port anymore, establishing all necessary lines (aortic vent, cardioplegia, cardiotomy vent) and stay sutures via minithoracotomy. The cannulation technique has undergone no changes since we started this approach; currently the market offer is larger and a surgeon can make his choice for available aortic and venous cannulas based on product characteristics and price (MMCTSLink 132, MMCTSLink 177, MMCTSLink 178).

The size of aortic cannula usually depends on patients' weight. As for the type of the cannula, it is the surgeon's choice. For patients with weight below 80–90 kg we prefer a 21F cannula, and 23F for those >90 kg, respectively. In the case of an extremely short or retrosternal ascending aorta a femoral artery cannulation is performed. Cardiopulmonary bypass is carried out with a vacuum-assisted venous return with a pressure around –40 mmHg. The choice of venous cannula is based on the same criteria as for the aortic cannula; mainly we employ a range of 22–25Fr, using a 21Fr cannula in a small patient. The prosthesis implantation and aortotomy closure procedure are as in a conventional approach.

It is also important to recognize that it is principally the chest incision component that can be improved by minimal access, and that the results like intensive care unit stay, hospital length of stay, and earlier mobilization are all consequences of a short incision, i.e. small surgical access. Postoperative outcomes are based on more ‘delicate’ surgery, with better respect to the integrity and anatomy of the tissues, from technical performance of the surgical team. A lot of components of the procedure are technically equivalent to those in conventional sternotomy.

Concomitant procedures: we started performing the treatment of atrial fibrillation with radiofrequency ablation (n=14) and the technical feasibility of the transaortic septal myectomy is another concomitant procedure which seemed absolutely feasible through minithoracotomy (n=6). Implantation of stentless bioprosthesis (n=1) was very difficult (19° Freedom Solo valve), because of working space limits within minithoracotomy. Retrograde administration of cardioplegia (n=4) was performed by placement of the catheter into the coronary sinus under TEE guidance. Complications such as a posterior aortic wall puncture with an aortic cannula type and iliac vein rupture during venous cannula insertion should be also kept in ones mind.

We think that confidence with this approach can be better acquired if the initial experience is supported with mitral valve repair or replacement through a right minithoracotomy. In this way the aortic valve replacement through minithoracotomy can be a method of choice because of its feasibility, safety and attractiveness. Further randomized studies are needed to better evaluate the outcomes and compare existing minimally invasive approaches [2, 3, 4].



    References
 Top
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Glauber M, Farneti A, Solinas M, Karimov J. Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy.Multimedia Man Cardiothorac Surg doi:10.1510/mmcts.2005.001826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Minale C, Reifschneider HJ, Schmitz E, Uckmann FP. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without sternotomy. Experience with the first 50 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:S126–S129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:S80–S83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Vanermen H. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599–1604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Latest literature

Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy
Mattia Glauber, Andrea Farneti, Marco Solinas, and Jamshid Karimov
MMCTS 2006 2006: 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related content

Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy
Mattia Glauber, Andrea Farneti, Marco Solinas, and Jamshid Karimov
MMCTS 2006 2006: 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MMCTSHome page
J. H. Karimov, M. Solinas, K. Latsuzbaia, M. Murzi, A. G. Cerillo, and M. Glauber
Surgical treatment of double and triple heart valve disease through a limited single-access right minithoracotomy
MMCTS, January 22, 2010; 2010(0122): 4036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this content is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this publication
Right arrow Alert me when new content is published
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jamshid H. Karimov
Mattia Glauber
Right arrow Alert me when related articles are published
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karimov, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karimov, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Aortic valve replacement
Right arrowLatest literature
Right arrowRelated content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS SEARCH